Do you need further help

with problems at work?

  JOBS

 

 
Home    Advice  
Post Info TOPIC: Benefits not sounding so good
Anonymous

Date:
Benefits not sounding so good
Permalink   
 


Hi,

Our company was bought out by another with a different HR setup to ours. Beginning of this year we heard that we will be moving over to the new company HR structure. We never had a medical aid or a pension fund. With the new structure it will become compulsory for the employees to have the beforementioned benefits. My question is: Is it legal to force us to take the benefits? Obviously the new benefits wil send us home with much less money after deductions. Do they have to adjust the salaries so that we take home the same as before the benefits or are they under no obligation to do it?

Thank you so much.



__________________
Labour Protect

Date:
Permalink   
 

Section 197 of the Labour Relations Act states that upon the transfer of a business as a going concern the new employer must provide the transfered employees with conditions or circumstances of work that are not less favourable than those that existed before the transfer. Would the medical aid and pension fund be considered less favourable? Probably not. However, upon transfer, the employment contracts are not cancelled and as such they remain unchangd. Therefore the new employer cannot force you to join the schemes but must negotiate and consult properly for such inclusion.



__________________
Anonymous

Date:
Permalink   
 

Thank you for your advice, I do understand that a medical aid and a provident fund will be a huge advantage especially if you did not have any of the before mentioned.

The problem that the majority of the employees face is that their current salaries are not sufficient enough to cover these benefits (on their own or via the company). According to the representative, the new company will pay the company’s share of the benefits and cover half of the loss on the current take home salary.

It still leaves the employee with a loss which he/she cannot afford.

Do the employees have a right to demand the same take home salary after the new deductions or will they have to accept the loss?



__________________
Anonymous

Date:
Permalink   
 

Labour Protect wrote:

Section 197 of the Labour Relations Act states that upon the transfer of a business as a going concern the new employer must provide the transfered employees with conditions or circumstances of work that are not less favourable than those that existed before the transfer. Would the medical aid and pension fund be considered less favourable? Probably not. However, upon transfer, the employment contracts are not cancelled and as such they remain unchangd. Therefore the new employer cannot force you to join the schemes but must negotiate and consult properly for such inclusion.


 Thank you for your advice, I do understand that a medical aid and a provident fund will be a huge advantage especially if you did not have any of the before mentioned.

The problem that the majority of the employees face is that their current salaries are not sufficient enough to cover these benefits (on their own or via the company). According to the representative, the new company will pay the company’s share of the benefits and cover half of the loss on the current take home salary.

It still leaves the employee with a loss which he/she cannot afford.

Do the employees have a right to demand the same take home salary after the new deductions or will they have to accept the loss?



__________________
Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us